The Most Important Game I’ve Ever Played

Right now, go to the Steam store, and spend ten dollars on Fate of the World.

Why do we make games?  Why do we play them?  More complicated questions than I’m going to fully plumb in this piece, but I could not unreasonably define it this way – we play to learn, about ourselves, about our fellow humans, and about our world.  By that measure, Fate of the World is perhaps the most successful game I have ever played.

The premise is simple.  By 2020, climate issues have worsened to the extent that a global organization is formed to oversee the planet’s collective response.  That organization is run by you.

Red Redemption studios partnered with top climate and political scientists, along with organizations like Oxfam to create perhaps the most complete, most accessible (and most depressing) model of where our planet is headed, and many of the proposed responses to those issues.

You’ll deal with water stress in Africa and the Middle East, the exploding toxicity of emissions in China, overpopulation and famine in India, and the ever-present spectre of war, in addition to the big ticket item on the table – rapidly rising emissions, global temperatures, rising sea levels, droughts and fires – the sort of global environmental crisis that many predict is all too likely.

So what are you going to do? I’ve tried dumping resources into technology, which is great, but the poorest parts of the world don’t have the infrastructure to support implementation of many of the potential future technologies we developed.  I tried to institute a global emissions cap and trade system, but couldn’t afford to implement it in every region – while it succeeded for a time, eventually the more industrialized nations overturned the policy in protest.  I’ve tried a mass conversion to renewables, and then watched as global financial markets collapsed in response to energy shortages.  After that, all my funding dried up, and the collapse hastened.  You need to balance the needs of the many with the fact that you’re dealing with multiple sovereign regions that will kick your little global NGO to the curb if you piss off the population too much with unpopular measures.

Let me be blunt:  this game is hard.  Even given some highly unlikely premises (“Hey, guess what, we’ve got unlimited fossil fuels after all!” or “As of today, the entire global population is united behind environmental causes!”) it’s still damn near impossible to get the whole mess under control.  And while there’s a certain grim educational aspect to the choices you get to make and their unintended consequences, (Want to transition China’s transportation grid off of fossil fuels and over to electric?  The manufacturing requirements will dramatically increase emissions over the short and medium term to do it!) the real fascinating lesson is what it showed me about myself.

The game has provisions for enacting black ops, and let us be clear:  I firmly believe that even if these sort of measures are never enacted, they will necessarily be on the table for our leaders in the future.  This includes regime change for governments that are opposed to regulation, covert sterilization programs to control exploding populations, or even release of targeted bio-weapons to reduce population.  While I haven’t wanted to go down that path, I was pleased to see their inclusion.

What’s fascinated me about my response more than anything is what it showed me about my attitude toward the world.  I was quick to institute a one-child policy in India, but not in the United States.  I was willing to dump tons of money into the U.S. and Europe to fund research, but struggled to come up with funds to fight political unrest in Southeast Asia.  I pretty much ignored Australia entirely.  While I was happy to enact technological reforms in the industrialized world, I was hesitant to levy extra taxes on those regions to fund them.  I was excited to spread 4th-gen nuclear power plant technology to the world, then found myself wishing I hadn’t, as rebels in northern Africa got their hands on weapons-grade nuclear material.  I’m a huge proponent of nuclear energy, but coming face to face with even a fictionalized consequence of my political beliefs was a little bit humbling.

We’re in the throes of a reactionary mood swing in this country, and I’m sure there are plenty of people out there who will attack the entire premise of the game as unfounded.  Even if you’re among them, I’d recommend this as a excellent strategy game.  But for those that acknowledge that resource management, population, and environmental issues are likely to define our world for the next two centuries, I unreservedly suggest that you take a stab at saving the world.  I haven’t had much success yet.  Getting some practice in before we have to do it for real seems pretty smart to me.

This entry was posted in Editorial and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to The Most Important Game I’ve Ever Played

  1. DAL says:

    I started playing it a few days ago. Difficult but fun!

  2. Pingback: The Sunday Papers | Rock, Paper, Shotgun

  3. Pingback: CHRISZAMANILLO.COM » This Week in Videogame Blogging:May 29th

  4. zipdrive says:

    This game is awesome, as in it induces awe in the player when one understands the enormity of the tasks you’re asked to perform.
    I found it hard, somewhat depressing and very inspiring.

  5. Jason says:

    The real problem with the game though is its premise that climate change is something that humans (a) cause and (b) can do anything about. That’s the BS of all of this climate change garbage. Global warming, climate change, ice-ages etc. are naturally occurring phenomena of a living planet. Ebbs and flows like this have been happening since day 1 long before we got here. The issue is that people have been brainwashed to combine thoughts about pollution with global climate. The 2 don’t go together. While human being are the cause of pollution and can do alot to address that problem, there is absolutely nothing you can do about climate change. The Earth is getting hotter due to its movement and position in the galaxy in relation to the the sun and the fact that the sun itself is getting larger and eventually will explode like all stars. It is so comical everytime I see people try to come up with ideas to reverse or fix something that they didn’t cause and have absolutely no control over. It is also evidence of how gullible human beings are that they ignore common sense and their own understanding in favor of being led to slaughter like sheep by those elite few who try to control your lives with taxes, laws and regulations cleverly sold as go green initiatives and save the planet BS that are really nothing more than attempts to separate you from your hard earned money and more importantly your God-given freedom.

    • Nik says:

      I’m certainly not going to argue the point, even though I disagree. It’s an issue we will have factually resolved within our lifetimes, one way or the other.

    • Pete says:

      I like the way that people who accept that something the majority of scientists believe are “brainwashed”, but people who take the word of pundits and demagogues with no relevants skills are “correct”.

      Always tickles me!

      Just like the way people think global warming means the planet’s getting hotter all over.

      “Global warming? It’s bloody cold in my house!”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>